Employment >
Technical Assistance Manual
Employment
Chapter III: The Reasonable Accommodation Obligation
3.10 Examples of Reasonable Accommodations
1. Making Facilities Accessible and Usable
The ADA establishes different requirements for accessibility under different
sections of the Act. A private employer's obligation to make its facilities
accessible to its job applicants and employees under Title I of the ADA
differs from the obligation of a place of public accommodation to provide
access in existing facilities to its customers and clients, and from the
obligations of public accommodations and commercial facilities to provide
accessibility in renovated or newly constructed buildings under Title III
of the Act. The obligation of a state and local government to provide access
for applicants and employees under Title I also differs from its obligation
to provide accessibility under Title II of the ADA.
The employer's obligation under Title I is to provide access for an individual
applicant to participate in the job application process, and for an individual
employee with a disability to perform the essential functions of his/her
job, including access to a building, to the work site, to needed equipment,
and to all facilities used by employees. The employer must provide such
access unless it would cause an undue hardship.
Under Title I, an employer is not required to make its existing facilities
accessible until a particular applicant or employee with a particular
disability needs an accommodation, and then the modifications should meet
that individual's work needs. The employer does not have to make changes
to provide access in places or facilities that will not be used by that
individual for employment related activities or benefits.
In contrast, Title III of the ADA requires that places of public accommodation
(such as banks, retail stores, theaters, hotels and restaurants) make
their goods and services accessible generally, to all people with disabilities.
Under Title III, existing buildings and facilities of a public accommodation
must be made accessible by removing architectural barriers or communications
barriers that are structural in nature, if this is "readily achievable."
If this is not "readily achievable," services must be provided to people
with disabilities in some alternative manner if this is "readily achievable."
The obligation for state and local governments to provide "program accessibility"
in existing facilities under Title II also differs from their obligation
to provide access as employers under Title I. Title II requires that these
governments operate each service, program or activity in existing facilities
so that, when viewed in its entirety, it is readily accessible to and
useable by persons with disabilities, unless this would cause a "fundamental
alteration" in the nature of the program or service, or would result in
"undue financial and administrative burdens."
In addition, private employers that occupy commercial facilities or operate
places of public accommodation and state and local governments must conform
to more extensive accessibility requirements under Title III and Title
II when making alterations to existing facilities or undertaking new construction.
(see Requirements for Renovation and New Construction
below.)
The accessibility requirements under Title II and III are established
in Department of Justice regulations. Employers may contact the Justice Department's
Office on the Americans with Disabilities Act for information on these
requirements and for copies of the regulations with applicable accessibility
guidelines.
When making changes to meet an individual's needs under Title I, an employer
will find it helpful to consult the applicable Department of Justice
accessibility guidelines as a starting point. It is advisable to make
changes that conform to these guidelines, if they meet the individual's
needs and do not impose an undue hardship, since such changes will be
useful in the future for accommodating others. However, even if a modification
meets the standards required under Title II or III, further adaptations
may be needed to meet the needs of a particular individual.
For example: A restroom may be modified to meet standard accessibility
requirements (including wider door and stalls, and grab bars in specified
locations) but it may be necessary to install a lower grab bar for a
very short person in a wheelchair so that this person can transfer from
the chair to the toilet.
Although the requirement for accessibility in employment is triggered
by the needs of a particular individual, employers should consider initiating
changes that will provide general accessibility, particularly for job
applicants, since it is likely that people with disabilities will apply
for jobs in the future.
For example: Employment offices and interview facilities should
be accessible to people using wheelchairs and others with mobility impairments.
Plans also should be in place for making job information accessible and
for communicating with people who have visual or hearing impairments.
(See Chapter V
. for additional guidance on accommodation in the application process.)
Accessibility to Perform the Essential Functions of the Job
The obligation to provide accessibility for a qualified individual with
a disability includes accessibility of the job site itself and all work-related
facilities.
Examples of accommodations that may be needed to make facilities accessible
and usable include:
- installing a ramp at the entrance to a building
- removing raised thresholds
- reserving parking spaces close to the work site that
are wide enough to allow people using wheelchairs to get in and out
of vehicles
- making restrooms accessible, including toilet stalls,
sinks, soap, and towels
- rearranging office furniture and equipment
- making a drinking fountain accessible (for example, by
installing a paper cup dispenser)
- making accessible, and providing an accessible "path
of travel" to, equipment and facilities used by an employee, such
as copying machines, meeting and training rooms, lunchrooms and lounges
- removing obstacles that might be potential hazards in
the path of people without vision
- adding flashing lights when alarm bells are normally
used, to alert an employee with a hearing impairment to emergencies
Requirements for Renovation or New Construction
While an employer's requirements for accessibility under Title I relate
to accommodation of an individual, as described above, employers will
have more extensive accessibility requirements under Title II or III of
the ADA if they make renovations to their facilities or undertake new construction.
Title III of the ADA requires that any alterations to, or new construction
of "commercial facilities," as well as places of public accommodation,
made after January 26, 1992, must conform to the "ADA Accessibility Guidelines"
(incorporated in Department of Justice Title III regulations). "Commercial
facilities" are defined as any nonresidential facility whose operations
affect commerce, including office buildings, factories and warehouses;
therefore, the facilities of most employers will be subject to this requirement.
An alteration is any change that affects the "usability" of a facility; it
does not include normal maintenance, such as painting, roofing or changes
to mechanical or electrical systems, unless the changes affect the "usability"
of the facility.
For example: If, during remodeling or renovation, a doorway is
relocated, the new doorway must be wide enough to meet the requirements of
the ADA Accessibility Guidelines.
Under Title III, all newly constructed public accommodations and commercial
facilities for which the last building permit is certified after January
26, 1992, and which are occupied after January 26, 1993, must be accessible
in accordance with the standards of the ADA Accessibility Guidelines.
However, Title III does not require elevators in facilities under 3 stories
or with less than 3000 square feet per floor, unless the building is a
shopping center, mall, professional office of a health provider, or public
transportation station.
Under Title II, any alterations to, or new construction of, State or local
government facilities made after January 26, 1992, must conform either
with the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (however, the exception regarding
elevators does not apply to State or local governments) or with the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards. Facilities under design on January 26,
1992 must comply with this requirement if bids were invited after that
date.
Providing accessibility in remodeled and new buildings usually can be
accomplished at minimal additional cost. Over time, fully accessible new
and remodeled buildings will reduce the need for many types of individualized
reasonable accommodations. Employers planning alterations to their facilities
or new construction should contact the Office on the Americans with Disabilities
Act in the U.S. Department of Justice for information on accessibility
requirements, including the ADA Accessibility Guidelines and the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Guidelines. Employers may get specific technical
information and guidance on accessibility by calling, toll-free, the Architectural
and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, at 1-800-USA-ABLE.
2. Job Restructuring
Job restructuring or job modification is a form of reasonable accommodation
which enables many qualified individuals with disabilities to perform
jobs effectively. Job restructuring as a reasonable accommodation may
involve reallocating or redistributing the marginal functions of a job.
However, an employer is not required to reallocate essential functions of
a job as a reasonable accommodation. Essential functions, by definition,
are those that a qualified individual must perform, with or without an accommodation.
For example: Inspection of identification cards is generally an essential
function of the job of a security job. If a person with a visual impairment
could not verify the identification of an individual using the photo
and other information on the card, the employer would not be required
to transfer this function to another employee.
Job restructuring frequently is accomplished by exchanging marginal functions
of a job that cannot be performed by a person with a disability for marginal
job functions performed by one or more other employees.
For example: An employer may have two jobs, each containing essential
functions and a number of marginal functions. The employer may hire an
individual with a disability who can perform the essential functions of
one job and some, but not all, of the marginal functions of both jobs.
As an accommodation, the employer may redistribute the marginal functions
so that all of the functions that can be performed by the person with a
disability are in this person's job and the remaining marginal functions
are transferred to the other job.
Although an employer is not required to reallocate essential job functions,
it may be a reasonable accommodation to modify the essential functions
of a job by changing when or how they are done.
For example: An essential function that is usually performed
in the early morning might be rescheduled to be performed later in
the day, if an individual has a disability that makes it impossible
to perform this function in the morning, and this would not cause an undue
hardship. A person who has a disability that makes it difficult
to write might be allowed to computerize records that have been maintained
manually. A person with mental retardation who can perform job tasks
but has difficulty remembering the order in which to do the tasks
might be provided with a list to check off each task; the checklist
could be reviewed by a supervisor at the end of the day.
Technical assistance in restructuring or modifying jobs for individuals
with specific limitations can be obtained from state vocational rehabilitation
agencies and other organizations with expertise in job analysis and job
restructuring for people with various disabilities.
3. Modified Work Schedules
An employer should consider modification of a regular work schedule as
a reasonable accommodation unless this would cause an undue hardship.
Modified work schedules may include flexibility in work hours or the work
week, or part-time work, where this will not be an undue hardship.
Many people with disabilities are fully qualified to perform jobs with
the accommodation of a modified work schedule. Some people are unable
to work a standard 9-5 work day, or a standard Monday to Friday work week;
others need some adjustment to regular schedules.
Some examples of modified work schedules as a reasonable accommodation:
An accountant with a mental disability required two hours off, twice
weekly, for sessions with a psychiatrist. He was permitted to take longer
lunch breaks and to make up the time by working later on those days.
A machinist has diabetes and must follow a strict schedule to keep blood
sugar levels stable. She must eat on a regular schedule and take insulin
at set times each day. This means that she cannot work the normal shift
rotations for machinists. As an accommodation, she is assigned to one
shift on a permanent basis. An employee who needs kidney dialysis treatment
is unable to work on two days because his treatment is only available
during work hours on weekdays. Depending on the nature of his work
and the nature of the employer's operation, it may be possible, without
causing an undue hardship, for him to work Saturday and Sunday in place
of the two weekdays, to perform work assignments at home on the weekend,
or to work three days a week as part-time employee.
People whose disabilities may need modified work schedules include those
who require special medical treatment for their disability (such as cancer
patients, people who have AIDS, or people with mental illness); people
who need rest periods (including some people who have multiple sclerosis,
cancer, diabetes, respiratory conditions, or mental illness); people whose
disabilities (such as diabetes) are affected by eating or sleeping schedules;
and people with mobility and other impairments who find it difficult to
use public transportation during peak hours, or who must depend upon special
para-transit schedules.
4. Flexible Leave Policies
Flexible leave policies should be considered as a reasonable accommodation
when people with disabilities require time off from work because of their
disability. An employer is not required to provide additional paid leave
as an accommodation, but should consider allowing use of accrued leave,
advanced leave, or leave without pay, where this will not cause an undue
hardship.
People with disabilities may require special leave for a number of reasons
related to their disability, such as:
- medical treatment related to the disability
- repair of a prosthesis or equipment
- temporary adverse conditions in the work environment
(for example, an air-conditioning breakdown causing temperature above
85 degrees could seriously harm the condition of a person with multiple
sclerosis);
- training in the use of an assistive device or a dog guide.
(However, if an assistive device is used at work and provided as
a reasonable accommodation, and if other employees receive training
during work hours, the disabled employee should receive training on this
device during work hours, without need to take leave.)
5. Reassignment to a Vacant Position
In general, the accommodation of reassignment should be considered only
when an accommodation is not possible in an employee's present job, or
when an accommodation in the employee's present job would cause an undue
hardship. Reassignment also may be a reasonable accommodation if both
employer and employee agree that this is more appropriate than accommodation
in the present job.
Consideration of reassignment is only required for employees. An employer
is not required to consider a different position for a job applicant
if s/he is not able to perform the essential functions of the position
s/he is applying for, with or without reasonable accommodation.
Reassignment may be an appropriate accommodation when an employee becomes
disabled, when a disability becomes more severe, or when changes or technological
developments in equipment affect the job performance of an employee with
a disability. If there is no accommodation that will enable the person
to perform the present job, or if it would be an undue hardship for the
employer to provide such accommodation, reassignment should be considered.
Reassignment may not be used to limit, segregate, or otherwise discriminate
against an employee with a disability. An employer may not reassign people
with disabilities only to certain undesirable positions, or only to certain
offices or facilities.
Reassignment should be made to a position equivalent to the one presently
held in terms of pay and other job status, if the individual is qualified
for the position and if such a position is vacant or will be vacant within
a reasonable amount of time. A "reasonable amount of time" should be
determined on a case-by-case basis, considering relevant factors such
as the types of jobs for which the employee with a disability would be
qualified; the frequency with which such jobs become available; the employer's
general policies regarding reassignments of employees; and any specific
policies regarding sick or injured employees.
For example: If there is no vacant position available at the time
that an individual with a disability requires a reassignment, but the
employer knows that an equivalent position for which this person is qualified
will become vacant within one or two weeks, the employer should reassign
the individual to the position when it becomes available.
An employer may reassign an individual to a lower graded position if there
are no accommodations that would enable the employee to remain in the
current position and there are no positions vacant or soon to be vacant
for which the employee is qualified (with or without an accommodation).
In such a situation, the employer does not have to maintain the individual's
salary at the level of the higher graded position, unless it does so for
other employees who are reassigned to lower graded positions.
An employer is not required to create a new job or to bump another employee
from a job in order to provide reassignment as a reasonable accommodation.
Nor is an employer required to promote an individual with a disability
to make such an accommodation.
6. Acquisition or Modification of Equipment and Devices
Purchase of equipment or modifications to existing equipment may be effective
accommodations for people with many types of disabilities.
There are many devices that make it possible for people to overcome existing
barriers to performing functions of a job. These devices range from very
simple solutions, such as an elastic band that can enable a person with
cerebral palsy to hold a pencil and write, to "high-tech" electronic equipment
that can be operated with eye or head movements by people who cannot use
their hands.
There are also many ways to modify standard equipment so as to enable
people with different functional limitations to perform jobs effectively
and safely. Many of these assistive devices and modifications are inexpensive.
Frequently, applicants and employees with disabilities can suggest effective
low cost devices or equipment. They have had a great deal of experience in
accommodating their disabilities, and many are informed about new and available
equipment. Where the job requires special adaptations of equipment, the employer
and the applicant or employee should use the process described earlier (see
) to identify the exact functional abilities and limitations of the individual
in relation to functional job needs, and to determine what type of assistance
may be needed.
There are many sources of technical assistance to help identify and locate
devices and equipment for specific job applications. An employer may
be able to get information needed simply by telephoning the Job Accommodation
Network, a free consulting service on accommodations, or your regional
DBTAC at 1-800-949-4232. Employers who need further assistance may use
resources such as vocational rehabilitation specialists, occupational therapists
and Independent Living Centers who will come on site to conduct a job analysis
and recommend appropriate equipment or job modifications.
As indicated above (see 3.4
), an employer is only obligated to provide equipment that is needed
to perform a job; there is no obligation to provide equipment that the
individual uses regularly in daily life, such as glasses, a hearing aid
or a wheelchair. However, as previously stated, the employer may be obligated
to provide items of this nature if special adaptations are required to perform
a job.
For example: It may be a reasonable accommodation to provide an
employee with a motorized wheelchair if her job requires movement between
buildings that are widely separated, and her disability prevents her
operation of a wheelchair manually for that distance, or if heavy, deep-pile
carpeting prevents operation of a manual wheelchair.
In some cases, it may be a reasonable accommodation to allow an applicant
or employee to provide and use equipment that an employer would not be
obligated to provide.
For example: It would be a reasonable accommodation to allow an
individual with a visual disability to provide his own guide dog.
Some examples of equipment and devices that may be reasonable accommodations:
TDDs (Telecommunication Devices for the Deaf) make it
possible for people with hearing and/or speech impairments to communicate
over the telephone
telephone amplifiers are useful for people with hearing
impairments
special software for standard computers and other equipment
can enlarge print or convert print documents to spoken words for
people with vision and/or reading disabilities
tactile markings on equipment in brailled or raised
print are helpful to people with visual impairments
telephone headsets and adaptive light switches can be
used by people with cerebral palsy or other manual disabilities
talking calculators can be used by people with visual
or reading disabilities
speaker phones may be effective for people who are amputees
or have other mobility impairments
Some examples of effective low cost assistive devices as reported by the
Job Accommodation Network and other sources:
a timer with an indicator light allowed a medical technician
who was deaf to perform laboratory tests. Cost $27.00
a clerk with limited use of her hands was provided a
"lazy susan" file holder that enabled her to reach all materials needed
for her job. Cost $85.00
A groundskeeper who had limited use of one arm was provided
a detachable extension arm for a rake. This enabled him to grasp
the handle on the extension with the impaired hand and control the
rake with the functional arm. Cost $20.00
A desk layout was changed from the right to left side
to enable a data entry operator who is visually impaired to perform
her job. Cost $0
A telephone amplifier designed to work with a hearing
aid allowed a plant worker to retain his job and avoid transfer to
a lower paid job. Cost $24.00
A blind receptionist was provided a light probe which
allowed her to determine which lines on the switchboard were ringing,
on hold, or in use. (A light-probe gives an audible signal when held
over an illuminated source.) Cost $50.00 to $100.00
A person who had use of only one hand, working in a
food service position could perform all tasks except opening cans.
She was provided with a one-handed can opener. Cost $35.00
Purchase of a light weight mop and a smaller broom
enabled an employee with Downs syndrome and congenital heart problems
to do his job with minimal strain. Cost under $40
A truck driver had carpal tunnel syndrome which limited
his wrist movement and caused extreme discomfort in cold weather.
A special wrist splint used with a glove designed for skin divers
made it possible for him to drive even in extreme weather conditions.
Cost $55.00
A phone headset allowed an insurance salesman with
cerebral palsy to write while talking to clients. Rental cost $6.00
per month
A simple cardboard form, called a "jig" made it possible
for a person with mental retardation to properly fold jeans as a stock
clerk in a retail store. Cost $0
Many recent technological innovations make it possible for people with
severe disabilities to be very productive employees. Although some of
this equipment is expensive, Federal tax credits, tax deductions, and
other sources of financing are available to help pay for higher cost equipment.
For example: A company hired a person who was legally blind as
a computer operator. The State Commission for the Blind paid half of the
cost of a braille terminal. Since all programmers were provided with computers,
the cost of the accommodation to this employer was only one- half of
the difference in cost between the braille terminal and a regular computer.
A smaller company also would be eligible for a tax credit for such cost.
(See Tax Credit for Small Business
, below)
For sources of information and technical assistance to help employers
develop or locate "assistive devices and equipment," contact your regional
DBTAC at 1-800-949-4232.
7. Adjusting and Modifying Examinations, Training Materials, and Policies
An employer may be required to modify, adjust, or make other reasonable
accommodations in the ways that tests and training are administered in
order to provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals
with disabilities. Revisions to other employment policies and practices
also may be required as reasonable accommodations.
a. Tests and Examinations
Accommodations may be needed to assure that tests or examinations measure
the actual ability of an individual to perform job functions, rather
than reflecting limitations caused by the disability. The ADA requires
that tests be given to people who have sensory, speaking, or manual impairments
in a format that does not require the use of the impaired skill, unless
that is the job-related skill the test is designed to measure.
For example: An applicant who has dyslexia, which causes difficulty
in reading, should be given an oral rather than a written test, unless
reading is an essential function of the job. Or, an individual with a
visual disability or a learning disability might be allowed more time
to take a test, unless the test is designed to measure speed required on
a job.
The employer is only required to provide a reasonable accommodation for
a test if the individual with a disability requests such an accommodation.
But the employer has an obligation to inform job applicants in advance
that a test will be given, so that an individual who needs an accommodation
can make such a request. (See Chapter
V
. for further guidance on accommodations in testing.)
b. Training
Reasonable accommodation should be provided, when needed, to give employees
with disabilities equal opportunity for training to perform their jobs
effectively and to progress in employment. Needed accommodations may include:
providing accessible training sites providing training materials
in alternate formats to accommodate a disability
For example: An individual with a visual disability may need training
materials on tape, in large print, or on a computer diskette. A person
with mental retardation may need materials in simplified language
or may need help in understanding test instructions modifying the manner
in which training is provided
For example: It may be a reasonable accommodation to allow more
time for training or to provide extra assistance to people with learning
disabilities or people with mental impairments.
Additional guidance on accommodations in training is provided in
Chapter VII
.
c. Other Policies
Adjustments to various existing policies may be necessary to provide reasonable
accommodation. As discussed above (see 3.10.3
and 3.10.4
), modifications to existing leave policies and regular work hours may
be required as accommodations. Or, for example, a company may need to modify
a policy prohibiting animals in the work place, so that a visually impaired
person can use a guide dog. Policies on providing information to employees
may need adjustment to assure that all information is available in accessible
formats for employees with disabilities. Policies on emergency evacuations
should be adjusted to provide effective accommodations for people with different
disabilities. (See Chapter VII
).
8. Providing Qualified Readers
It may be a reasonable accommodation to provide a reader for a qualified
individual with a disability, if this would not impose an undue hardship.
For example: A court has held under the Rehabilitation Act that
it was not an undue hardship for a large state agency to provide full-time
readers for three blind employees, in view of its very substantial budget.
However, it may be an undue hardship for a smaller agency or business
to provide such an accommodation.
In some job situations a reader may be the most effective and efficient
accommodation, but in other situations alternative accommodations may
enable an individual with a visual disability to perform job tasks just
as effectively.
When an applicant or employee has a visual disability, the employer and
the individual should use the "process" outlined in
3.8
above to identify specific limitations of the individual in relation
to specific needs of the job and to assess possible accommodations.
For example: People with visual impairments perform many jobs that
do not require reading. Where reading is an essential job function, depending
on the nature of a visual impairment and the nature of job tasks, print
magnification equipment or a talking computer may be more effective for
the individual and less costly for an employer than providing another employee
as a reader. Where an individual has to read lengthy documents, a reader
who transcribes documents onto tapes may be a more effective accommodation.
Providing a reader does not mean that it is necessary to hire a full-time
employee for this service. Few jobs require an individual to spend all
day reading. A reader may be a part-time employee or full-time employee
who performs other duties. However, the person who reads to a visually
impaired employee must read well enough to enable the individual to perform
his or her job effectively. It would not be a reasonable accommodation to
provide a reader whose poor skills hinder the job performance of the individual
with a disability.
9. Providing Qualified Interpreters
Providing an interpreter on an "as-needed" basis may be a reasonable accommodation
for a person who is deaf in some employment situations, if this does
not impose an undue hardship.
If an individual with a disability is otherwise qualified to perform essential
job functions, the employer's basic obligation is to provide an accommodation
that will enable this person to perform the job effectively. A person
who is deaf or hearing- impaired should be able to communicate effectively
with others as required by the duties of the job. Identifying the needs
of the individual in relation to specific job tasks will determine whether
or when an interpreter may be needed. The resources available to the employer
would be considered in determining whether it would be an undue hardship
to provide such an accommodation.
For example: It may be necessary to obtain a qualified interpreter
for a job interview, because for many jobs the applicant and interviewer
must communicate fully and effectively to evaluate whether the applicant
is qualified to do the job. Once hired, however, if the individual is doing
clerical work, research, computer applications, or other job tasks that
do not require much verbal communication, an interpreter may only be needed
occasionally. Interpretation may be necessary for training situations, staff
meetings or an employee party, so that this person can fully participate
in these functions. Communication on the job may be handled through different
means, depending on the situation, such as written notes, "signing" by other
employees who have received basic sign language training, or by typing on
a computer or typewriter.
People with hearing impairments have different communication needs and
use different modes of communication. Some use signing in American Sign
Language, but others use sign language that has different manual codes.
Some people rely on an oral interpreter who silently mouths words spoken
by others to make them easier to lip read. Many hearing-impaired people
use their voices to communicate, and some combine talking and signing. The
individual should be consulted to determine the most effective means of
communication.
Communication between a person who is deaf and others through a supervisor
and/or co-worker with basic sign language training may be sufficient
in many job situations. However, where extensive discussions or complex
subject matter is involved, a trained interpreter may be needed to provide
effective communication. Experienced interpreters usually have received
special training and may be certified by a professional interpreting organization
or state or local Commission serving people who are deaf.
10. Other Accommodations
There are many other accommodations that may be effective for people with
different disabilities in different jobs. The examples of accommodations
in EEOC regulations and the examples in this Manual are not the only types
of accommodations that may be required. Some other accommodations that
may be appropriate include:
- making transportation provided by the employer accessible
- providing a personal assistant for certain job- related
functions, such as a page turner for a person who has no hands, or
a travel attendant to act as a sighted guide to assist a blind employee
on occasional business trips
- use of a job coach for people with mental retardation
and other disabilities who benefit from individualized on-the job training
and services provided at no cost by vocational rehabilitation agencies
in "supported employment" programs.
Generally, it will be "unreasonable" for an employer to violate a seniority
system in order to provide a reassignment. However, there may be "special circumstances" that
undermine employee expectations about the uniform application of the seniority
system, and thus it may be a "reasonable accommodation," absent undue hardship,
to reassign an employee despite the existence of a seniority system. There
is not an exhaustive list of what constitutes "special circumstances," but
examples may include where a seniority system contains exceptions such that
one more is unlikely to matter, or where an employer retains the right to alter
unilaterally the seniority system and has done so fairly frequently.
Top
|